CVEInsight.
TrendingZero-DayExploreBrowseSearchSaved
CVEInsight.

Free vulnerability intelligence for developers, security teams, and researchers. Data sourced from public databases for informational purposes only.

Explore

HomeTrendingZero-Day WatchAttack TypesBrowse CVEsSearch

Legal

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceData Disclaimer

© 2026CVEInsight. For informational use only — not a substitute for professional security advice.

CVE data sourced from NVD / NIST & public disclosures.

siemens

simatic_net_cp_1545-1_firmware

5 known vulnerabilities · sorted by CVSS score

CVE-2020-9273
HIGH8.8

In ProFTPD 1.3.7, it is possible to corrupt the memory pool by interrupting the data transfer channel. This triggers a use-after-free in alloc_pool in pool.c, and possible remote code execution.

proftpd / proftpd+10
Network
Published Feb 20, 2020
CVE-2021-41991
HIGH7.5

The in-memory certificate cache in strongSwan before 5.9.4 has a remote integer overflow upon receiving many requests with different certificates to fill the cache and later trigger the replacement of cache entries. The code attempts to select a less-often-used cache entry by means of a random number generator, but this is not done correctly. Remote code execution might be a slight possibility.

strongswan / strongswan+28
Network
Published Oct 18, 2021
CVE-2020-27827
HIGH7.5

A flaw was found in multiple versions of OpenvSwitch. Specially crafted LLDP packets can cause memory to be lost when allocating data to handle specific optional TLVs, potentially causing a denial of service. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability.

lldpd_project / lldpd+26
Network
Published Mar 18, 2021
CVE-2020-9272
HIGH7.5

ProFTPD 1.3.7 has an out-of-bounds (OOB) read vulnerability in mod_cap via the cap_text.c cap_to_text function.

proftpd / proftpd+5
Network
Published Feb 20, 2020
CVE-2021-3449
MEDIUM5.9

An OpenSSL TLS server may crash if sent a maliciously crafted renegotiation ClientHello message from a client. If a TLSv1.2 renegotiation ClientHello omits the signature_algorithms extension (where it was present in the initial ClientHello), but includes a signature_algorithms_cert extension then a NULL pointer dereference will result, leading to a crash and a denial of service attack. A server is only vulnerable if it has TLSv1.2 and renegotiation enabled (which is the default configuration). OpenSSL TLS clients are not impacted by this issue. All OpenSSL 1.1.1 versions are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1k. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1k (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1j).

openssl / openssl+142
Network
Published Mar 25, 2021