In Puma (RubyGem) before 4.3.5 and 3.12.6, a client could smuggle a request through a proxy, causing the proxy to send a response back to another unknown client. If the proxy uses persistent connections and the client adds another request in via HTTP pipelining, the proxy may mistake it as the first request's body. Puma, however, would see it as two requests, and when processing the second request, send back a response that the proxy does not expect. If the proxy has reused the persistent connection to Puma to send another request for a different client, the second response from the first client will be sent to the second client. This is a similar but different vulnerability from CVE-2020-11076. The problem has been fixed in Puma 3.12.6 and Puma 4.3.5.
AI analysis not yet available
Plain-English explanation, risk summary, and remediation steps will appear here once AI analysis is complete.
No Fix Known
No patch has been released yet. Apply workarounds or mitigations where available.
Published
CVE disclosed publicly
Last Modified
Most recent update
Indexed to CVEInsight
Added to this platform
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N
6
Affected Products
12
References
puma / puma
| fedoraproject | fedora | - | - |
| debian | debian_linux | - | - |
| opensuse | leap | - | - |
| opensuse | leap | - | - |
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N
Exploitability
Impact